Talk:The Utilikilts Company

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Fashion Low‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Washington / Seattle Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Seattle.

Untitled

In case anyone wanders by, I fleshed out this stub a bit using newspaper articles collected on the old Utilikilts website (found through archive.org). I tracked down and linked the articles that I could, but had to rely mostly on copies archived on Utilikilts own site. I've no reason to suspect any of the articles were edited (or totally faked), but they weren't direct scans so it's impossible to prove without subscribing to the pay-for-access archives of most of the newspaper's websites. They claim worldwide sales, and seem to hit many Scottish or Celtic festivals around the US, so perhaps there's more local coverage elsewhere. --InkSplotch 03:33, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial Success: a recurring character in the webcomic "The Trenches" wears a kilt, which he has confirmed is a Utilikilt. http://trenchescomic.com/comic/post/attire --Eagle52997 192.33.240.95 (talk) 19:27, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wil Wheaton

Wil Wheaton has tweeted on occasion that he wore a Sport Kilt on The Guild, not a Utilikilt. See [[1]], [[2]], and [[3]] 66.193.41.206 (talk) 20:59, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This article DOES have a neutral POV

Perhaps the complainant has anti-LGBT views? I've noted that UtiliKilts are popular in Seattle among gay men, especially in the Queen Anne neighborhood (local fashion trend) of Seattle. The Seattle times does require a subscription and the local neighborhood newspapers don't have online archives. However I'm miffed at Wikipedia's incredible stupidity in not allowing information about a company (this is a company not a product) to come from the company's web site or from SEC filings. If the information is public and not copyrighted it should be included. I think a note to the unwise that a company's website MIGHT be biased seems superfluous. Shjacks45 (talk) 23:25, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:Offline sources and WP:PAYWALL. It's of no concern that some articles are behind paywalls or are not online. Cite them as you would any source. If you want to add information, please do so. I don't follow anything else you've said. The article is currently written like an advertisement and should be rewritten in a more neutral tone. Pulling in self-published sources is not the solution to that. Company sources may be cited for uncontroversial facts but anything that might be challenged should come from an independent source. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 02:22, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]