Talk:The United People of Canada

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A few questions…

Is there a source for the claims that they were trying to buy the building?

All the the sources that I’ve seen suggest that they rented the space - which is apparently a heritage building - and immediately began renovating it without the approval (or even the knowledge) of the property owners or liability insurance.

Maybe this should be linked to the sovereign citizen moment. 🙄

Also, the article in the Ottawa Citizen says that there are links between the group and the so-called “Freedom Convoy”.

Let the wild rumpus begin! 24.77.153.192 (talk) 19:46, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article is fully sourced, so I don't know why you need to ask about their attempts to buy it. But citation 7 details this.

I put in what is verifiable, which, as I saw it, was that they denied being linked. The links seems speculative. But you're free to make or propose an edit. As you appear to have never edited wikipedia before, I do appreciate you asking here rather than jumping in an editing, as this is clearly a more polarising topic than most. CT55555 (talk) 19:52, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]