This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey articles
I've seen greater articles deleted for less than merely existing, whats the deal with this one?
I do apologize if it seems like I'm begging a question or trolling or baiting or whatever we define it as now, I'm just genuinely curious as to the merits of this article existing when it tells me practically less than an amazon listing for it's content. This looks like the kind of content I might have written to appease a teacher's classroom demands in high school, which I have no problems with, I just find it remarkable to watch the internal politics of wikipedian culture play out in content choices. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.67.54.87 (talk) 07:44, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]