Talk:The Two Roses
Appearance
The Two Roses has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 10, 2015. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Note
[edit]Lubin produced a "The Two Roses" in 1914 with Ormi Hawley, but instead of a two way disamb - it might need a full disambiguation because a popular vaudeville act "The Two Roses" was making its way around in 1910. I have neither enough information to give either its own page - but this is a note for future readers. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 19:29, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:The Two Roses/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Good888 (talk · contribs) 15:23, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
Going to take a look at this article soon. good888 (talk) 15:23, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
Lead section
- "The film focuses on the young Tony Prolo who goes to deliver lunch to his father, Tony Prolo." Might as well rewrite to: "The film focuses on the young Tony Prolo who goes to deliver lunch to his father of the same name."
Plot
- "The father, Tony Prolo, greets his young son and happily takes his lunch." Rewrite to: "The father, also called Tony Prolo, greets his young son and happily takes his lunch." or something similar.
Production
- "The film director is unknown, two Thanhouser directors are possible." Rewrite to: "The film director is unknown, but two Thanhouser directors are possible."
That's all I can find. On hold for now. good888 (talk) 10:37, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Good888: All set. I also tightened the wording in the plot a bit more. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 06:48, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- Promoting to GA class! good888 (talk) 19:39, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Good888: All set. I also tightened the wording in the plot a bit more. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 06:48, 10 March 2015 (UTC)