Talk:The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part 2

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

United States: Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force.

Romance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romance, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional romance in literature and romantic fiction writers. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.RomanceWikipedia:WikiProject RomanceTemplate:WikiProject Romanceromance articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part 1 was copied or moved into The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part 2 with this edit on August 30, 2012. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

main pic

is there a reason the main picture in the infobox changes on almost a daily occurrence? Lady Lotus (talk) 15:04, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Split

I think the music section should split into a soundtrack article.--NeoBatfreak (talk) 08:18, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Upon reading your suggestion, I have split the music section into a separate page specifically for the soundtrack albums. It can be found at The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part 2 (soundtrack). --TFunk (talk) 23:34, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Critical reception

Even though the film has a 48% rotten rating, there is not one negative review listed. MsBlackworld (talk) 07:02, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is there no mention in the Critical Reception section of this article that this film won almost every Golden Raspberry Award of 2012. Almost everything in this section of the article points to a positive reception, which this movie was a far cry from receiving. 2602:306:307B:2800:AC94:B4AF:A907:AD49 (talk) 20:31, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130325072602/http://www.nick.com/kids-choice-awards/2013/nominees/ to http://www.nick.com/kids-choice-awards/2013/nominees/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:59, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]