Talk:The Trouble with Harry

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

United States: Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

A note

"the film was a box office disappointment"

Maybe in America. The bonus featured on the DVD seem to imply that it was a "hit" in Europe. Revolver 04:16, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Technicolor camera

This sentence: "In the gym, a 500 lb (226 kg) Technicolor camera fell from a great height and barely missed hitting Hitchcock." ...is slightly problematic, I think. The last American-made 3-strip Technicolor feature was 'Foxfire' from a few years earlier. The credit "Color by Technicolor", by the time of this picture's production, meant imbibition processing of single-strip Eastmancolor filmstock, not 3-strip Technicolor filmstock. The newer process obviated the Technicolor camera, and thus it would not have been used on this production.

I remember hearing the story of the fallen camera that nearly hit Hitch many years ago, so I'm not doubting its veracity. But it must have been a VistaVision camera. Berberry (talk) 15:55, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Thetroublewithharry1.jpg

Image:Thetroublewithharry1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:35, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IMDb's

Half this article is lifted from info submitted to IMDb, mainly from the Trivia page. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 04:27, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the text at IMDb was copied from Wikipedia, some years ago. Invertzoo (talk) 14:07, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So what? All info requires reliable sourcing, and IMDB doesn't qualify. You claim they lifted it from here; where's your documentation? If it's here, there must be sources, and those sources should be used. Not IMDB. Canonblack (talk) 16:48, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Trouble with Harry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090510020229/http://www.bartonchronicle.com/index.php/reviews/books/110-asurpriseoneverypage to http://www.bartonchronicle.com/index.php/reviews/books/110-asurpriseoneverypage

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:12, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]