Talk:The Tech Report
This article was nominated for deletion on 11 July 2019. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
This page is still under construction be patient and it will form into a proper article--24.119.127.33 2 July 2005 17:35 (UTC)
I've started to cull out some of the useless information to make the article more fitting for Wikipedia.--Stranger July 2, 2005 17:48 (UTC)
The CBE section?
[edit]How 'bout somebody clean that up? --Bhtooefr 2 July 2005 19:47 (UTC)
cleaning up and removing pov
[edit]Cleaned up a bunch of wording to remove POV. Removed the following 'Many years later, Damage confessed a deep-seated, unexplainable, and unrelenting dislike for all things hyphenated, and the old Tech-Report.com died under the wheels of progress, paving the way for the otherwise identical 'Techreport.com' (NO DASH!!). Things were never the same again. J E Bailey 6 July 2005 14:26 (UTC)
It would also help if someone could find dates.. when was this website founded, what date did it move from tech-report.com to techreport.com. Things like that. J E Bailey 6 July 2005 14:26 (UTC)
Removed conjecture and opinion related words. J E Bailey 6 July 2005 14:26 (UTC)
VfD results
[edit]This article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep. For details, please see The Tech Report. -- BD2412 talk 02:48, July 12, 2005 (UTC)
Tom's Hardware Guide?
[edit]Is there anything verifiable about the "rivalry" between TR and THG? While they are certainly in competition with each other, I don't think rivalry has anything to do with it. My understanding is that there is some bad blood between the two, but I don't recall seeing anything on the page about it.
Thresher (talk) 18:30, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm removing this statement as it is not verifiable from what I can see, and is possible defamatory in nature. Sure I registered just to edit this page, but I'm not affiliated in any way. There is also neutral POV issues with this bit at the very least.
--Captaintrav (talk) 13:08, 8 August 2009 (UTC)