Talk:The Te of Piglet
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Has anyone ever felt they benefitted from reading this book? If so in what way? Thanks :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.50.233.253 (talk • contribs)
++No. This book is sad and confused. An angry reactive diatribe - which is hardly representative of Taoist philosophy. Hoff attacks everyhting from rock music to feminism. Odd. Yankoz.
- No!?!? How can you claim that nobody has benefitted from reading this book? I assume that Hoff read it - and he benefitted a great deal from the profits, as did his editor, who had to read it. So, right there, you have two people who benefitted from reading the book. --Kainaw (talk) 04:48, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Novel?
[edit]The Tao of Pooh is a work of non-fiction, and by no means a novel as it is described in this article. John1701 (talk) 22:27, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Chinese stories
[edit]"most Chinese stories are rather inaccessible to Westerners." Can anybody actually qualify this? John1701 (talk) 22:33, 9 December 2007 (UTC)