Talk:The Tale of Despereaux (film)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Tale of Despereaux (film) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Animation: Films / Computer Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Computer animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Film: British / American / Animated

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Animated films task force.

Differences

The differences from the book says both of these, which is right:

In the book, Despereaux is part of a litter. His siblings all die at birth. This sad detail is omitted from the film.

In the book, Despereaux had many mice brothers and sisters including a sister named "Merlot". In the film, there is only Despereaux and Furlough. --Erroneuz1 (talk) 06:22, 12 April 2009 (UTC) In the book, Botticelli is shown as an ordinary rat, in the film, he is shown as the leader of the rats. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.157.148.14 (talk) 15:01, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In the book, Botticelli returns to the darkness without dying (he was disgusted by the rescue of Pea), but in the movie, Ruscuro charges at him, thus forcing him into the cat cage for a painful death. --65.93.41.167 (talk) 19:46, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Improving the article

Someone possibly could put on a link to the wikipedia page for the book, for any reference that is not in the film's article. (Bricsontos) July 15, 2009

The opening sentence has a link to it under "same name". BOVINEBOY2008 12:43, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted a sentence about Production which stated that Chomet stole budget from Despereraux to fund his own film The Illusionist and that was why he was fired: the sentence was referenced but the reference made no mention of money, never mind a financial scandal. It was all about authorship. ~freaky dragonlady, 12 August, 2010

Anonymous web comments as a "source"?

The bits about Chomet using funds allocated for Despereaux on L'Illusioniste and hs replacements directing by voicemail have as their source unsubstantiated comments in the talkback section of a page hosting the trailer. This is just awful, the exact kind of shaky sourcing that people mock Wikipedia for using. If legitimate sources can't be found, these should be deleted from the entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.194.146.143 (talk) 01:57, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Universal Animation Studios

Did this studio have any involvement in the film? I’m not so sure it did. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 06:34, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]