Talk:The Supremes (The West Wing)

A fact from The Supremes (The West Wing) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 October 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that "The Supremes" was said to have foreseen the conflict following the death of Antonin Scalia, twelve years later?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Supremes (The West Wing).

Wikipedia

Television: Episode coverage / The West Wing Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article is supported by the West Wing task force (assessed as Low-importance).

"Errors"

Is Josh's statement about 6 moderates really an error in the script? To me, it seems more like a realistic portrayal of the use of hyperbole by a political operative. --Hickoryhillster (talk) 14:34, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 16:42, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that "The Supremes" was said to have foreseen the conflict following the death of Antonin Scalia, twelve years later? This West Wing Episode Predicted the Controversy Around Scalia’s Replacement in Eerie Detail... I’ve heard those kinds of tributes nonstop over the past few days. But this quote wasn’t said in the past few days. It had nothing to do with Scalia. It was said on The West Wing 12 years ago.

Reviewed: IBM Palm Top PC 110

Converted from a redirect by Theleekycauldron (talk). Self-nominated at 08:14, 4 October 2021 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing:
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing: - ?

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Looks good to me. I notice, however, some close paraphrase from the Slate source -- could this be fixed? (Ping me with a response, or else I may not see it) jp×g 04:39, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@JPxG: do you mean the reaction, or the plot? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 05:08, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What I mean is that in the reaction section, all the quotes from Slate are attributed, so that's fine; but in the plot section, it seems to use almost all the same quotes from the episode as the Slate article, which gives me some pause. jp×g 05:13, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@JPxG: this better? Some of the quotes Slate uses are pivotal to the episode, I can't quite help that, but I hope this works. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 05:53, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]