Jump to content

Talk:The Stranger (Ingrid Andress song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleThe Stranger (Ingrid Andress song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starThe Stranger (Ingrid Andress song) is part of the Lady Like series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 3, 2022Good article nomineeListed
October 28, 2022Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 2, 2022.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Ingrid Andress said that she wished she included a parrot which startled her in the music video for her single "The Stranger"?
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:The Stranger (Ingrid Andress song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 07:51, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

I will get on with this review today! --K. Peake 07:51, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

[edit]
  • The lengths are not sourced anywhere in the body
  • Andress → Ingrid Andress in the infobox producers parameter, as this is not a track listing
    • Could you explain this a bit more? From what I've seen, there are song articles who use the full name if the producer is also a songwriter, and some who only use the surname if said producer is also a songwriter. Sebbirrrr (talk) 17:18, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Add a comma after debut studio album
  • "The track was written by" → "The song was written by" to be consistent
  • "was handled by Andress and" → "was handled by it and"
  • "on February 4, 2017 for" → "on February 4, 2017, for"
  • "from Lady Like in" → "from the album in"
  • "a lost romance. Andress was inspired to write the track" → "a lost romance and Andress was inspired to write it"
  • "the song's theme as well as" → "the song's theme, as well as"
  • Wikilink as music videos
  • "in February 2017 via CMT" → "in February 2017, via CMT,"
  • "the same day as Andress' debut album." → "the same day as Lady Like."

Background and release

[edit]
  • Merge with the below section, retitling to Background and composition
  • "She returned to" → "Andress returned to"
  • "Kara DioGuardi who was" → "Kara DioGuardi, who was"
  • Move the release info to the reception section, which I will instruct more further on
  • "in May 2020 announcing that the song will" → "in May 2020, announcing that the song would"
  • Mention what nation the country radio stations are in
  • "as the next single" → "as a new single"
  • Mention when the deluxe was released

Composition and lyrics

[edit]
  • Make this the second para of the above section
  • "and produced it with" → "and handled the production with"
  • "It discusses a" → "The song discusses a"
  • "elaborating that "most songs" → "elaborating: "Most songs" since this is a full sentence
  • "never an in-between"." → "never an in-between."" per MOS:QUOTE on full sentences
  • "romanticized movies" and that" → "romanticized movies" and"
  • CMT should not be italicised
  • "piano-driven exposé"." → "piano-driven expose"."
  • "the lyric "You" → "the line "You"

Reception

[edit]
  • Retitle to Release and reception, with the release info making up the first para
  • "received positive reviews from" → "was met with positive reviews from"
  • "Caramanica and deemed it" → "Caramanica deemed it"
  • "of the track and that it" → "of the track and it"
  • "ABC News Radio called it" → "The staff of ABC News Radio called the song"
  • "for Sounds Like Nashville deemed" → "for Sounds Like Nashville, deemed"
  • "at number 49 and at number 54" → "at numbers 49 and 54"

Promotion

[edit]
  • Wikilink music video
  • "February 22, 2017 via CMT." → "February 22, 2017, via CMT."
  • "on March 27, 2020 coinciding" → "on March 27, 2020, coinciding"
  • The location is only sourced as a house, not a mansion
  • CMT should not be italicised
  • "and that she wished she would have" → "wishing in retrospect she would have"
  • "and was hoping that" → "and was hoping"
  • Shouldn't the performances be identified as in February and May 2020, respectively?
  • Wikilink Country Radio Seminar per MOS:LINK2SECT

Track listing

[edit]
  • Shouldn't this section be added to source the separate lengths?
    • I added it because the reimagined version also has a different length. However, the 2020 version of the song wasn't released as a separate single for digital download so I instead mentioned it in the background and composition section. Sebbirrrr (talk) 17:18, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Personnel

[edit]
  • Good

Release history

[edit]
  • Label → Label(s)

References

[edit]
  • Copyvio score looks great at 28.6%!!!
  • Cite Spotify as publisher instead on ref 5
  • Cite ABC News Radio as publisher instead on ref 15
  • WP:OVERLINK of YouTube on ref 22 and add Y108 in the publisher parameter, piping to WDSY-FM

Final comments and verdict

[edit]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk00:03, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by Sebbirrrr (talk). Self-nominated at 20:11, 3 August 2022 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article is good; promoted to GA status yesterday. Copyvio score good. The hook is sourced. I don't think it's very interesting but that's subjective so I won't fail based on that alone. QPQ not needed —VersaceSpace 🌃 13:48, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]