Talk:The Story of a Fierce Bad Rabbit/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kaguya-chan (talk) 14:31, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   The first paragraph in Composition and publication has no source

Done. References entered. Susanne2009NYC (talk) 19:04, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

1. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

3. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

4. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

5. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Wonderful work. It now meets the GA criteria. Keep up the good work! Kaguya-chan (talk) 19:14, 20 July 2010 (UTC)