Jump to content

Talk:The Splendid Source

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleThe Splendid Source has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 12, 2010Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:The Splendid Source/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman Operation Big Bear 03:42, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to review this, since it's been at GAN forever. It'll be a few days before I get to it though, have a very large article to finish reviewing. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 03:42, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here are the issues I found:

Just a couple issues. Article will be on hold for 5 days, when fixed I'll pass it. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 03:53, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good now, so the article passes. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 05:33, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Splendid Source. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:47, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]