Talk:The Skeptic (British magazine)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Article format/contents
[edit]I think 7 screens listing all the past issues is a bit much. Richard001 (talk) 06:42, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Agreed.
[edit]"Previous Volumes" is a word-for-word copy of information available at the website, and an unnecessary list at a website where such lists are frowned upon. This from a fan of The Skeptic. Cluebot automatically reverts, if anyone wants to go ahead and fix this. 67.164.44.216 (talk) 23:56, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Editorial Advisory Board
[edit]I note that the entire (and very large) advisory board seems to be listed, including a number of presumably non-notable individuals (no wiki article). Is this useful to the reader? What about paring it down somewhat, to a "List of notable people on the Editorial Advisory Board"? Plazak (talk) 16:17, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Skeptic (UK magazine). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120911110843/https://www.miroguide.com/audio/14423 to https://www.miroguide.com/audio/14423
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:42, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Copied this WP to my sandbox
[edit]I will add info from a source, so I copied this WP to my sandbox to start working on it. Joao1975 (talk) 14:49, 7 September 2023 (UTC)