Talk:The Sixth Extinction (The X-Files)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 14:15, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For an unknown reason, Wizardman deleted this page. Maybe it was just impatience...

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Good prose; no complaints
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
References reliable; formating is consistent and follows the guidelines
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Infobox screenshot image is non-free but it follows the non-free file criteria, and its FUR is complete and does not violate the mentioned criteria. Second file is in public domain. Captions are good
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
I see no issues with this article. I did not like how it was removed without discussion (maybe the nominator proposed it, I don't know). I was busy in the last days, so forgive my delay. Good work as usual! :)--♫GoP♫_T ^C _N 14:15, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to mention this about three months late, but I just want you to know that it wasn't me. :P --Gen. Quon (talk) 21:55, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sometimes nominations that have been inactive are deleted so that the article appears in the queue as unreviewed again, checking the page logs might show who deleted it. 22:03, 5 April 2012 (UTC)