Talk:The Simpsons: Bartman Meets Radioactive Man/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Namcokid47 (talk · contribs) 21:00, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Instantly failing nomination due to the article not meeting the GA criteria. There are several reasons as to why, which are listed below.

Very little in the way of references; lots had to be cut out for not being verifiable or simply unreliable (like MobyGames). Additional, many sections (namely the near-entirety of the gameplay) have no references at all.
No gameplay screenshot.
Gameplay section itself talks very little about the gameplay, only providing a short plot summary and vague sentences about what it's actually about.
Many things in the article are not sourced, such as the release date, who worked on it, etc.
Review scores for video games do not belong in the paragraphs themselves. That requires a video game review template, which this article lacks.
Ref 6 isn't archived properly and is missing a lot of required parameters.
Article itself is full of poor writing. Most of the reception is just quotes ripped from whatever publications covered it. It isn't even stringed together to form a cohesive summary of what the reviewers thought about it, instead just being "publication said this, publication said that". There's also other poorly-worded sentences throughout the article too, such as "criticism being directed at the gameplay control."
The reviewer for the article also does not seem to be a major contributor to the page itself, simply adding a review or two and some very minor corrections.