Talk:The Shorter Cambridge Medieval History

A fact from The Shorter Cambridge Medieval History appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 November 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that reviewers wondered whether there were so many facts in The Shorter Cambridge Medieval History that it had become chronicle rather than history?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/November. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Shorter Cambridge Medieval History.

Wikipedia

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Europe Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 08:23, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that reviewers wondered whether there were so many facts in the The Shorter Cambridge Medieval History that it had become chronicle rather than history?
- ALT1: ... that ...?

Reviewed: Broken toe

Created by Philafrenzy (talk) and Whispyhistory (talk). Nominated by Philafrenzy (talk) at 23:05, 10 November 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Still got some reviews to integrate. Philafrenzy (talk) 23:05, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There are more but I am done for now. Philafrenzy (talk) 22:27, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New article is 7,251 characters long and nominated two days after creation. No copyvios detected and duplication detector of online sources[1][2] reveal no close paraphrasing issues (AGF sources which can't go through Dup detector). Article is well-sourced. Hook is 152 characters long (under 200 character max.) and is interesting. Ref 8 (verifying the hook) is a reliable source. QPQ done. Looks good to go! —Bloom6132 (talk) 08:41, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ALT0 to T:DYK/P1