Talk:The She Beast

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: British

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.

Recent cleanup

Two things here, people: Count von Helsing is not Abraham Van Helsing from Dracula (their names aren't even spelt the same), so please don't link the name to the Van Helsing article; a trivia item (and trivia items are discouraged in Wikipedia) regarding an unrelated production that Steel was involved in 40 years after the fact is completely irrelevant here. If you must add sludge to a trivia section, at least have the sense to include trivia related to the subject of the article. 12.22.250.4 23:28, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Shebeast.jpg

Image:Shebeast.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:05, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status

I have deleted the link to the illicit hosting of this British film on Internet Archive. Co-writer Charles B. Griffith did not die until 2007, so UK copyright subsists until the end of 2077. As a non-US film still under copyright in its country of origin on 1 January 1996, it is protected in the US for 95 years after publication, so to the end of 2061. Nick Cooper (talk) 11:42, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate Tone

I somehow doubt the comment about Groper being an apt name and the final sentence of the plot being a question match the encyclopaedic style that wikipedia hopes to present 207.179.167.106 (talk) 22:04, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]