Talk:The Secret of Anastasia

This article was nominated for deletion on 10 January 2010. The result of the discussion was redirect to UAV Corp. corp.

Film: American

	Film portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Animation: American / Films

	Animation portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation
	This redirect is supported by the American animation work group.
	This redirect is supported by the Animated films work group.

Should a deletion discussion be opened?

Disregarding the many other issues with this article, the title of the film is in fact The Secret of Anastasia as opposed to The Secrets of Anastasia.

Furthermore, an article titled The Secret of Anastasia exists on Wikipedia and was already nominated for deletion once for reasons similar to that of this page (orphaned article, notability, unverifiable content, etc.). The result of the deletion discussion in the end was to redirect the article to an article about company that produced the film.

This all leads me to wonder whether this article shouldn't be nominated for deletion too since its title is incorrect, it fails to address the issues of the older The Secret of Anastasia article, and it is a recreation of an article that was redirected to begin with (not sure if that last issue falls under CSD G4 or not since the article was actually redirected rather than deleted). What does everybody else think? Shvybzik (talk) 09:19, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]