Talk:The Secret (2006 film)/Archive 4
 | This non-existent page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | This is an archive of past discussions about The Secret (2006 film). Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
GOCE
Mlpearc pull my chain Trib's 01:10, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Testing - who can upload the video again =the secret of creating yr future!
Hi Anybody can help?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.10.89.201 (talk) 16:07, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
Anger and extremism in opinions
Reading through the comments here I am disappointed with the quality of thought driving what seems to be just a discussion section. Science models the world with reference to verifiable experiments and sources of fact but it does not give anyone absolute knowledge of anything. Since science produces a model and not absolute knowledge, it is also subject to change and benefits from objectivity and open-mindedness. Obviously some people will seek to exploit others through religions, philosophy and spurious claims. Thinking you can achieve something and asking for help gives you a chance to succeed. This is about all I get out of the secret. But this is very valuable advice. Claims that you are right since you a professor at UCLA or that you can cure disease through positive thought are examples of craziness to be ignored. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Modeloftruth (talk • contribs) 13:58, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
NPOV
The article especially the criticism section is so heavily weighted towards a pejorative view especially given the size of the criticism section, its hard to believe. Since the crit. section has also been tagged since 2010, I'd suggest its time to fix it. I'll see what I can do.(olive (talk) 22:56, 31 July 2012 (UTC))
- Agreed. The "See also" abounds with links that have nothing to do with the movie, and appear to represent an unsubtle attempt to bias this article. Kortoso (talk)
That's generally true with all Wikipedia articles on anything relating to spirituality, as the vast majority of Wikipedia volunteers and contributors are left-wing extremists. ~~PB~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.162.240.241 (talk) 14:21, 9 July 2015 (UTC)