Talk:The Second Life of Doctor Mirage
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Seems to be a lot of overlap on the two pages to me, And I don't see any compelling reason to keep them seperate, it's not as if Doctor Mirage has 4 books of his own. --Impulse 04:03, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
- Don't see any reason why not to either. There's a lot of redundant or extraneous pages dealing with Valiant Comics stuff at the moment. g026r 15:37, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- For what it is worth, I concur with both of you -- the two pages overlap, and I don't see a reason for either to exist independent of the other -- Simon Cursitor 07:53, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Suggestions for improvement
[edit]Waaay too many parantheses.
Reads like advertising copy.
Not even one mention of their comedy-relief houseguest?
Lots42 01:29, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Second Life of Dr. Mirage. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20091109104815/http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=5852 to http://www.newsarama.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=5852
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:23, 20 July 2016 (UTC)