Talk:The Sea Urchin (1913 film)

The Sea Urchin (1913 film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: February 3, 2015. (Reviewed version).

Film: Silent / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Silent films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

Extra notes

This is just a few more references showing nothing exceptional or of great value to the article:

These might be useful those who want to track the release cycles. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 22:45, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Sea Urchin (1913 film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Good888 (talk · contribs) 12:04, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to review ALL of the films you have listed at the good article nominations page. It may take more than seven days so please be patient. good888 (talk) 12:04, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lead section

Link hunchback under kyphosis.
"The film is now considered lost." Suggest rewriting to: "The film is presumed lost"

Production

"and distributed by The Universal Film Manufacturing Company." Should be linked under Universal Studios.
"The film's production number was 0101." Do you have a source confirming this?

Release and legacy

"Link picturesque.
"In an advertisement in Rushville, Indiana the filmw" I have removed that w.

Going to place on hold for now. good888 (talk) 13:48, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Good888: - Fixes done. And bit of a note, the Universal Studios and its earlier incarnation are different in a sense, but the article for that does not exist yet. Silent Era covers the production code - so I didn't cite it directly at the end of each sentence because of all the information being reflected by that same source. The Films of Lon Chaney confirms it - but I suspect that it came from Braff's work, which also confirms. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 17:24, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gave this article another look and found no issues. Hence, I am passing. good888 (talk) 13:39, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]