Talk:The Savage Rose
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]I am a BIG Savage Rose fan, and I do not believe that they may be categorized as "psychedelic," although certainly some of their music may. Please listen to a broader range of their music.Cospelero (talk) 18:31, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Savage Rose have their own unique sound but thropugh the years they have been folk, rock, soul, gospel, classical etc. Today they should be classified as soul , in 67 as psychedelic, in the 80s as folk . train2train
Cristgau's hateful and uninformed review needs to go
[edit]While Cristgau may be a key reviewer in US 70s counterculture, the review pasted into this article about a long lasting non-English European band is such a pile of uninformed spiteful personal attacks based on only one early album that it shouldn't be elevated to be the final word about 50 years as an iconic voice in political music. 77.213.212.241 (talk) 16:28, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (musicians) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (musicians) articles
- Musicians work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class Denmark articles
- Low-importance Denmark articles
- All WikiProject Denmark pages