Talk:The Rough Patch (book)
Appearance
The Rough Patch (book) has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: February 26, 2019. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:The Rough Patch (book)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Nova Crystallis (talk · contribs) 18:37, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Reviewing later. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 18:37, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
- Caldecott Honor should be linked in the lead.
- Done
- "Author an illustrator"
- Done
- Shouldn't the beginning of the first quote be capitalized?
- I admit that I'm better with construction than grammar but I thought because the quote starts in the middle of a sentence of his and is in the middle of my sentence it didn't need to be capitalized. I've done it because I am probably wrong. Best wishes, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:03, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
- What is a "grandparent character?"
- Clarified
- How reliable is ref #10? I'm not sure that type of site is a good source.
- Yeah that's fair. I've never used it before but found their about page positive. If you think it should be removed I will. Best wishes, Barkeep49 (talk)
- Caldecott awards' website should be archive, because the book won't be there in 2020.
- Done
That should be it. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 02:48, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Nova Crystallis: See responses above. Best wishes, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:45, 26 February 2019 (UTC)