Talk:The Roller Blade Seven

The Legend of the Roller Blade Seven was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 30 July 2019 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into The Roller Blade Seven. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Return of the Roller Blade Seven was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 30 July 2019 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into The Roller Blade Seven. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Plot

I don't think the film can have much more synopsis than this. It's completely bizarre, has no plot to speak of and I'm convinced this "Zen filmmaking" is a lot of Emperor's new clothes. How about removing a few of those banners? Famous Mortimer 13:18, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a short paragraph detailing the film's unique style, as I don't believe it is adequately covered. This could be expanded, though I'm not sure how to go about it while remaining NPOV. Euchrid (talk) 22:06, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of "needs infobox" tag

This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB. Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 17:46, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Entertainment Weekly?

Is there even the tiniest chance that interview with Stone is correct? And if someone sees this edit, it looks like the [1] and [2] links are broken, and I don't know how to sort them. Famous Mortimer (talk) 12:53, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming that this - http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,308766_3,00.html - is the article in question, there is no mention of Roller Blade Seven at all. Euchrid (talk) 04:24, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As there's been no response to my previous comment I've removed the Oliver Stone quote Euchrid (talk) 21:40, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Critique

My inclusion of the fact that the movie has a 2.1 star rating and negative reviews on imdb was removed under the grounds that it is 'untrue and inappropriate?'? For the first point, you only have to follow the link to see that this is in fact the case: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0102804/ For the second, it is completely appropriate, even necessary, to mentions critical reception of a film in the article. If I don't hear a better explanation I'm restoring the removed sentence. Euchrid (talk) 01:51, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reception

With regard to the Reception section, and the removal of the reviews, obviously the blogs quoted are far from ideal sources, but I still feel like they're better than no section at all. When dealing with a weird, underground, film like this, you have to go where the sources are.Euchrid (talk) 03:17, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]