Talk:The Ring Two

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Japanese cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Censored

Barney is PIMPOLICOUS with his quote "Im Rich Bitch" Id like to discuss the issue of profanity on wikipedia. I just removed "fucking" from the phrase "I'm not your fucking mommy!" in the article of the ring 2. I think, since Wikipedia is a free encycolpedia, it should cater to everyone, including, perhaps, the occasional young user. I don't know, maybe I'm being too extreme with this, but I do think "fuck" and other profanity might be too bad for the free encycopledia. Opinions?

Wikipedia is not censored. If we're going to include the quote, then we certainly shouldn't misquote it (it's factually incorrect to claim that the character speaks a different thing to what is actually said). Removing the word leads to an incorrect quote, and as stated at Wikipedia:Profanity, this isn't something we should do, nor should it be replaced with asterisks. Mdwh 02:56, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cliffhanger?

Why does the plot summary (which is preceded by a spoiler warning) end on a cliffhanger? This is an encyclopedia, not the back of a movie case. I'd change it myself, but I haven't seen the movie.

I agree. Someone should add this info, but i havent seen the film Rossheth 00:44, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have a question.

How come no one is adding the differences between the theater and unrated versions of The Ring Two? Both editions are out, so how come no ones filling up that subsection?

I added a small paragraph about the unrated edition, but I don't think I remembered everything that was added, and the paragraph probably needs to be cleaned up... --Wikicali00

Here's the ending

I wrote the plot summary originally and decided to add the ending. You have a good point about this being an encyclopedia and not a movie review. --Wikicali00

Im not the above user but I agree. I also added the conclusion section to the first movie -- Psi edit

Request

If there's anyone reading this who is more experienced on writing about movies in an encyclopedia-based format than I am, please help by cleaning up this article. I gave a VERY wordy description of the plot and hope somebody can use the information to fix it. --Wikicali00

Film Name

Does anyone know if the "official" name of the film is The Ring twO (as spelled)? Most of the reviews I've seen (including the article) indicated The Ring Two or variants, but the box cover, advertising and most promotional items state "twO". Anyone have an idea on that?--み使い Mitsukai 03:31, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That is purely for aesthetic effect, I'd wager. The "O" is meant to symbolise the ring itself and doesn't have any impact on the way the title should be written. 65.145.213.126 06:38, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My DVD box cover says "The Ring Two". I've never seen "twO" when written in text, and not part of that logo. Mdwh 21:37, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup?

Can someone possibly provide rationale as to why the Plot section is tagged for cleanup? I see nothing in the way of it needing such attention so I am wondering if the original tagger can provide some insight into what needs to be done, otherwise I will remove the tag. 65.145.213.126 06:37, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was the one who originally wrote the plot summary and requested it be cleaned up because I wasn't happy with how it flowed in an "encyplopedia" format. It appears a lot better now, and if you want to remove the tag, by all means, go ahead. Wikicali00

When will The Ring Three be released?

Does anyone know the release date of The Ring Three film? Although it had been confirmed, Dreamworks does not give us an actual date. Will it be released in 2008? --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 15:40, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why Munchausen rather than simple abuse?

Can someone indicate where the reference to Munchausen by proxy is in the movie? I have just seen the movie, and there is no such reference. There is no indication that the psychiatrist suspects Munchausen rather than plain abuse, and I see no reason to introduce this specific term where it is nowhere else stated. If I am wrong, please state, but as a psychologist, the situation presented by the protagonists in the movie looks nothing like Munchausen by proxie, far from it. mark'huss - oct 10 06

Character's name

Aiden or Aidan? Which one is the real name of the boy from the film? We should change the two into one —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr Vinx (talk • contribs) 05:00, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question about the scene with Evelyn

Ok, this has been bugging me. In the scene where Rachel first meets Evelyn, the orderly mentions that this has happened before, that "every few years, one of you comes to see Evelyn. She's like a freakin' patron saint", and he mentions that the other cases involved a problem with their kid, and even mentions that everyone that comes to see her knows the song she's singing.

This implies that Samara has done this before, attempted to possess someone in order to come back entirely. What's up with that? I thought Samara had been trapped in the well, unable to escape, until the end of the first movie, which took place 6 months before this one... Avatarian86 (talk) 17:18, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sequel Plot

IS this the actual plot??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.116.82.39 (talk) 20:44, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that the information in the "Sequel" section is accurate, and even if it is, it's very badly written.

It should probably be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.105.36.24 (talk) 23:24, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sequel plot

As of november 2008 the ring 3 has no plot. Also Naomi is not returning —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.116.82.39 (talk) 07:50, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Promo 'Cursed' Video?

I've seen a supposedly 'new' cursed video on Youtube, and I've heard that it's some kind of promotional video based on the original cursed videotape from the Ring. Is it some kind of hidden feature on the DVD, or a TV ad? Where did it come from (I'm assuming Dreamworks just slapped it together)? And would it be relevant info for this article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.163.31.198 (talk) 05:19, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Info about director in sequel section.

I previously removed Wes Craven as the director because there is no concrete proof he will be directing the sequel. Someone put it up again but I think until they have a concrete reference the director should be removed — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.116.84.215 (talk) 04:57, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Ring 3D

Why does "The Ring 3D" redirect here? --Yashowardhani (talk) 14:43, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]