Talk:The Return (2006 film)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Return (2006 film) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Horror

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Was Griff Wife's Ex-Boyfriend?

I got the impression that Griff was just a random weirdo who tried to pick up women and who followed her back to her house when she "insulted" him

If he had known her surely he would have known she was married and that her husband could turn up at any time . Garda40 19:35, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is story summary really too informal?

Someone (presumably with authority) has indicated that the story summary lacks the "formal tone" expected of an encyclopedia. Having surveyed other movie and TV show articles in Wikipedia, I am not convinced that this is the case, but I speak with a bias, having contributed heavily to the summary. Anyone who wants to make it more "formal" is free to do so. I think it's just right, and I wonder if the person who tagged it is perhaps prone to confuse "formal" with "stodgy and badly written". Prudentius 00:07, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:The Return movie.jpg

Image:The Return movie.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]