Talk:The Restoration (1910 film)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 19:18, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Don't worry, we'll get through these JAGUAR 19:18, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguations: No links found.
Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- I would recommend splitting the lead into two paragraphs to make the lead more balanced, per WP:LEAD
- "Little is known of the production credits, but the film does feature Marie Eline as the little girl" - could be re-worded so Marie Eline is mentioned first
- Nothing on production in the lead?
- "The writer of the scenario is unknown, but it was most likely Lloyd Lonergan" - this needs a citation
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
The reception section is very well detailed, so this one should come to a pass like the rest. Well done JAGUAR 20:55, 2 June 2015 (UTC)