Jump to content

Talk:The Red Chord

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Initial text

[edit]

This band was part of Ozzfest 2006, which is a national tour. Doesn't that establish notability? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edward Hyena (talk • contribs) 17:11, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ugh. Another Wikinerd going around tagging any band he hasn't heard of.

The band was not only a part of Ozzfest, the largest heavy metal tour in America and perhaps the world; but are also released an album on Metal Blade Records, a prominent underground label in the heavy metal scene. they are as notable as any other underground band who deserve inclusion here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.57.203.72 (talk) 15:31, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Need Urgent Cleanup on "Releases".

[edit]

Section is poorly put together. Bottomline. Lacks sourcing, proper structure, and requires a serious proofreading. I'll do as much as I can (assuming I'm not the biggest Red Chord fan in the world, my assistance will be of minimal help) but I think it's safe to say we need a complete rewrite on the topic of releases / discography. --ARandomHeretic 02:20, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

notability tag

[edit]

I removed the notability tag. This band is most certainly notable within the metacore world. They are on an important metal record label as well as touring the U.S. consistantly. Notability is most certainly established.--Tainter 14:23, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:The Red Chord-logo.png

[edit]

Image:The Red Chord-logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:48, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:The Red Chord-logo.png

[edit]

Image:The Red Chord-logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 00:19, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Genre dispute

[edit]

-- I dont agree with labeling this as Deathcore, not so long ago when i visited this page i remember seeing it just being considered Grindcore ( which they sounds very much like, especially the first album). Now i see this term "Deathcore" comming up all over the place and dont agree with sticking that genre label to The red Chord. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.240.210.102 (talk) 23:26, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Genre

[edit]

While The Red Chord is a mix of Death metal and Metalcore (excluding Fused Together), I hate calling them Deathcore. When you compare them to other deathcore bands like Job For A Cowboy, Suicide Silence, etc. they sound nothing like the genre they are associated with. I think their genre should definitely be changed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.147.164.16 (talk) 04:00, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

well it not like bleeding through who mix Metalcore withe melodic death metal and so don't get the Deathcore tag. but yes i get it when u hear a band like this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonjonjohny (talk • contribs) 14:37, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's Technical Death Metal, it has all the signs, including the unusual time signatures, tempo changes, and the such. It isn't Grindcore, it isn't Deathcore, it's TDM. --AtheistFish (talk) 18:27, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings AtheistFish. Please read WP:OR. And also please do not edit the article before the discussion has been closed. Mind that edit warring is not recommended.--  LYKANTROP  ✉ 18:53, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Both "technical death metal" and "grindcore" are unsourced. 70.152.176.62 (talk) 16:35, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
False.--  LYKANTROP  ✉ 14:02, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Really? I must be missing the sources. I found deathgrind, something along the lines of "grindcore-style death metal", and deathcore, but nothing else. 68.220.75.28 (talk) 02:42, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes, exactly! You are really missing the sources. Simple as that. There are sources, and you're missing them! Ain't that funny? But I reworded the section to make it even more explicit, just to make You happy!--  LYKANTROP  ✉ 10:04, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

a response to Gunmetal Angel

[edit]

greets! this is a response to this edit by Gunmetal Angel:

  • 1. please do not remove sources from the article (allmusic and musicmight).
  • 2. please do not add unappropriate images to the article. a completely grimaced face of 1 out of 4 members covering half of his face with a hand is not the right choice for an infobox of a group of people. see Wikipedia:Images especially Wikipedia:Images#Image choice and placement. other bands with similar images on the articles are not relevant. if some article uses wrong images, there is more sense in replacing or removing wrong images rather than in adding wrong images also into other articles. except for this, wikipedia itslef can't be used as a source (therefore you don't need to mention other articles at all).

cheers.--  LYKANTROP  ✉ 22:52, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For one, there was really no reason not to leave this on MY talk page, and second, fine, I understand the image guidelines. As for genres, they're fine as of now until narrowed down by more sources (predictions: technical death metal, goregrind, death metal). -- GunMetal Angel 23:09, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on The Red Chord. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:43, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Red_Chord&oldid=1204687786"