Talk:The Red Balloon

France Mid‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: French C‑class

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
	This article is supported by the French cinema task force.

This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Spring 2018. Further details are available on the course page.

"magically happy" ending?

I thought it was rather sinister. He could seemingly replace and forget about the eponymous red balloon - which followed him for days, and which he obviously became extremely attached to - with a load of other balloons.

Perhaps it's a little critique on how easily children form and break bonds? -- w0lfman —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.229.242.86 (talk) 13:32, 25 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Yes, I tend to agree. We have a film critic w/ The Washington Post, that argues the same thing. See article. I will keep working on the PLOT, and delete this, in a sense, NPOV, sentence. Luigibob 20:49, 1 December 2007 (UTC)Talk to Luigibob![reply]

Is there any other commentary on what the imagery of the movie means to different people. Any psychological motivations the filmmaker had in mind? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.170.123.249 (talk) 18:05, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Music

Very nice article... but it doesn't include anything about the film's music... which was actually perfect!! I love the music of this film... can anything be included? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.203.71.224 (talk) 11:55, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever happened to Pascal Lamorisse?

I can't seem to find any info on what he is doing these days... Is he a film director, like his father? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.22.79.228 (talk) 18:09, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a CHAT room....Luigibob (talk) 07:26, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Other wins

What's with the "Other wins" section? Why not put it all under "Wins"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.101.36.152 (talk) 22:03, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Netfilx appearance?

I wonder if the article should have a section on some of the short film's footage in Netflix commercials? Who knows? Maybe I could put it in later. :)
~~LDEJRuff~~ ^{(see what I've contributed)} 23:09, 23 September 2008 (EDT)

Special Effects? Parodies.

This 34-minute short seems to have been made on a rather small budget. Does anyone know how much it cost to make (US dollars or French francs) and how the special effects were achieved? How did they control the floating "sentient" balloon? At the end, how did they do the cluster balloon shot over Paris? Did Albert really allow his son Pascal to be flown up high on a crane or dangling from a helicopter?

On another note, there are a number of parodies of The Red Balloon. Revenge of the Red Balloon (2000) is a good one (8 minute short; free in a few places on the internet). Pascal and the bullying boys have grown up and the Red Balloon returns on a murderous rampage. AdderUser (talk) 08:03, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Red Balloon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071211183420/http://www.nbrmp.org/awards/past.cfm?year=1957 to http://www.nbrmp.org/awards/past.cfm?year=1957

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:05, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Queen Mary University of London education assignment

Hi, we're a group of students editing this article for an assignment at Queen Mary, our usernames are Meganellis (talk) 13:57, 26 January 2018 (UTC) ?=) Linnea Borg (talk) 13:58, 26 January 2018 (UTC)Stephen Noorshargh (talk) 13:59, 26 January 2018 (UTC)81.157.234.93 (talk) 15:01, 30 January 2018 (UTC)Lucindashaw (talk) 15:01, 30 January 2018 (UTC) Olivertill97 (talk) 11:48, 2 February 2018 (UTC) Hrholway (talk) 13:41, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We have made some changes to the plot and cast list, to make them more coherent and accurate. Linnea Borg (talk) 13:48, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Linnea - that's great to hear that you're planning on making those changes, but actually, these are likely to be less effective as places where you can improve the scholarly quality of the page. Try to think about evaluating sources, fact-checking, and making sure that the information contained on the page is verifiable, rather than going for the 'easier' segments that can be easily checked (like plot and cast). Keep researching, especially in the libraries as we discussed in week 4 of the course. And good luck! DrJennyCee (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]