Talk:The Rain King/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Grapple X (talk · contribs) 20:44, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Gave things a polish, looking alright now.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Seems grand. Removed a bit of overcite, where a few instances of the same citation in a row could have been collapsed into each other.
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Scope seems grand, reception's good for a late-season ep. I could expand it more but it's good enough to pass for now.
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Not a problem.
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Grand.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Image needs something to tie it specifically to the article. Maybe it could be abandoned and replaced with one showing the character's missing leg, as the effects for that are discussed in the article.
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Just going to stick this on hold to see if the image can be swapped; if you don't have access to the episode then let me know and I'll go get mine. Should be grand otherwise. GRAPPLE X 20:44, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I uploaded a new one that show's him attaching his fake leg, along with a blurb about it.--Gen. Quon (talk) 00:47, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, that's perfect. Going to pass this one now. GRAPPLE X 00:54, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]