This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Can't quite understand why this should be speedy deleted. The band released an album and several singles, and toured nationally for a few years. They seem to me to meet WP:MUSIC. I've just created the article as a stub, but will try to find more info and refs, but this is proving difficult due to the number of bands called Rain/The Rain and the commonness of that term.--Michig (talk) 16:13, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This seems familiar - I just removed a CSD from another article you created. The article was extra-stubby when created, but this one was actually pretty fleshed out, so I don't know what that's about. You may want to take it up with the person who tagged it. Natalie (talk) 18:28, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
While I don't necessarily disagree with also moving the article about the pre-Oasis band, it is unhelpful to make changes while this discussion is going on. older ≠ wiser13:19, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Seems a bit pointless having this discussion while the discussion is also going on re. the pre-Oasis band. That one should end in a merge/redirect, meaning this one can stay where it is with a hatnote pointing to Oasis. Moving it to a title that they were not primarily known by just to avoid disambiguation makes no sense to me. --Michig (talk) 07:17, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Why? If the Oasis one gets redirected we will only have one article on a band called The Rain, so no need to disabiguate beyond '(band)'. --Michig (talk) 19:57, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That doesn't matter, since it isn't the only topic that is a band called "The Rain" covered on Wikipedia, as Oasis was precursored by "The Rain" and we aren't going to delete the Oasis article, thus coverage exists there. Indeed people could easy point out that "(band)" should point to the Oasis topic and not this one. -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 04:43, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Anyone looking for Oasis is realistically going to go straight to that page. This band is clearly the only one that had any notability with this name. We can handle the unlikely case where someone is looking for Oasis by searching on the name they briefly had with a hatnote and an entry on the dismbiguation page. A similar situation is The Warlocks, where we have one band that is notable as 'The Warlocks' but two other notable bands who (while they were pretty much unknown) went by that name for a time - there is no need for us to title that article 'The Warlocks (Los Angeles, California band)' simply because other bands that had the same name are mentioned in other articles. --Michig (talk) 09:48, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That situation is in no way analogous. "The Warlocks" is a primary topic pagename; thus it does not carry a disambiguator. This pagename includes the parenthetical disambiguator "band", so is not a primary topic. Thus it requires additional disambiguatory material. If you wish to propose this to be the primary topic of the term "The Rain", then you can put up an alternate proposal to move this article to The Rain (and move the other pages around), but as it is right now, it requires additional disambiguation. If this band is not the primary topic of the term "The Rain" (overtop of all other uses, not just the other band), then it still requires additional disambiguation because it is not a primary topic, so in all cases it can never reside at "The Rain (band)", which should always point to the disambiguation page. -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 06:20, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.