Talk:The Quick and the Wed

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Fair use rationale for Image:Veronica Mars 2x15.jpg

Image:Veronica Mars 2x15.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:20, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

The article is tagged as "Unreferenced" and "Notability". The obvious and perfect source is the episode itself. It's available on DVD and I have recorded it on VHS. Nothing in the article can be disputed or proved wrong. I'll remove the tags. Urbanus Secundus (talk) 16:55, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, primary sources do not count. _Xeworlebi ^(talk) 17:04, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the original work not good as source? Urbanus Secundus (talk) 20:39, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is good as a source, it just doesn't count when saying something doesn't have sources otherwise everything has a source just by existing. _Xeworlebi ^(talk) 20:45, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What does this article need in order to have the tags removed? Can you please explain that, and also could you fix it if you think of yourself as adept on the subject? Thanks.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Urbanus Secundus (talk • contribs)

You need to establish notability, add reliable third party sources about something; reception, production, etc. _Xeworlebi ^(talk) 17:27, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]