Talk:The Prioress's Tale

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of Interfaith work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Poetry: The Canterbury Tales Mid‑importance

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by The Canterbury Tales task force.

Length

This article could be longer, but it is already of very high-quality.

Number 1----you are unsigned, and that makes me wonder.

Number 2----why would you just say that 'The article could be longer.' Propose some suggestions, give some critical :analysis, research some sources. You have contributed nothing by that remark.--Rocketrye12 02:43, 30 November 2006 (UTC)what?[reply]

If there is discussion regarding merging the article on Madame Eglantine with the article on The Prioress's Tale, I think it makes good sense. The description of Madame Eglantine within the General Prologue of The Canterbury Tales is too short to warrant an article on its own, and there isn't much more than can be said about her, unless scholarly details are included (i.e., citations from various scholarly resources on Madame Eglantine as a character). While I am wholly behind that project, I feel that, at present, the article on Madame Eglantine as it currently stands is not useful enough to warrant its own space on Wikipedia, and the information contained within would better serve as a supplement to The Prioress's Tale. Furthermore, the article as it is currently written is actually very poorly written, and doesn't enhance a reader's knowledge of the Prioress, her tale, or her relationship to other characters within The Canterbury Tales. I therefore suggest that the information be rewritten, and merged with the article on the tale itself, until such time as further research warrants its own article. -- Faton4paws (talk) 18:02, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Antisemitic publications?

Should this really be under the category? The prioress herself is the object of ridicule with this tale. I will remove it.--Mr. 123453334 (talk) 14:25, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]