Talk:The Princess Diaries, Volume II: Princess in the Spotlight

This article was nominated for deletion on 21 March 2007. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

This article was nominated for deletion on February 10, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

Novels Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Children's literature Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I highly recommend that this page be merged into Princess Diaries and deleted because it serves no purpose to Wikipedia. If someone wants an entire summary, they can read the actual book. The series as a whole is more important than this individual book, and this book only really needs a blurb on Meg Cabot's or Princess Diaries' page. There is no reason for it to be here. It may be a popular series, but each book doesn't need a page of its own. Maggieab10k 05:18, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's plenty of precedent for individual series books to have their own articles. If there's a content issue be bold and revise it. 23skidoo 13:19, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Why not a page per title, this is small cost for a significant Young Adult novel. Highly popular in it's field. We are not here to be elitist, it is notable, it should be here. :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 13:49, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree with merging. I agree with Page-per-title. This means y'all who've read the books will need to plop down some Plot Summaries, and (if possible) errata or inconsistencies with previous books, etc. --Lexein 13:35, 23 March 2007 (UTC) (sorry for prior missing sig)[reply]

I would like the Plot section to be trimmed down so it's not a Cliff Notes. --Lexein 13:35, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]