Jump to content

Talk:The Playwright's Love/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: DepressedPer (talk · contribs) 20:30, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


I'll take the position of reviewing this article. Give me a few minutes.

Here are some minor issues I found:

  • Link 'playwright' found in both the Lead and Plot sections.
  • The New York Dramatic Mirror is linked three times: twice in Production and in Release and reception. Remove the second link found in Production.
  • Link the publishers in the sources if possible.
  • I added an External links section with an IMDb page of the film.
  • Some of the sources' accessdates should be formatted to mdy.

The rest of the article is well-written, with references placed in when needed and there's good structure found in the sections. I'll put this on hold until all the issues are handled. DepressedPer (talk) 22:46, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DepressedPer - All set, I made the fixes and switched the dates over. I find it strange to link to IMDb when Wikipedia is superior, but it works. Tracking down the references for The Prince Chap was pretty tough, hopefully I can make an article on that play one day. Also... the plot of this film is pretty morally reprehensible today, but I couldn't find any source to comment on it. Thanks for reviewing. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 06:07, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Everything looks proper and the issues have been dealt with. I'll give the go ahead to pass this as a GA. DepressedPer (talk) 07:08, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.