This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
A fact from The Oxford History of Christian Worship appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 May 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that The Oxford History of Christian Worship was appraised by one reviewer as "by far the best example in the English language" of a multiauthored liturgical history? Source: Lathrop, Gordon W. (April 2007). "The Oxford History of Christian Worship: Geoffrey Wainwright and Karen Westerfield Tucker, editors: New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. 923 pp. $55.00". Theology Today. 64 (1). Princeton Theological Seminary: 112–114
Overall: Based on my review, I think this is good to go once the QPQs are complete. I couldn't think of a more interesting hook, so I feel like this one is interesting enough. Please ping me when the QPQs are ready. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 02:24, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@LEvalyn: I've completed one QPQ with another one pending a reply. I think I could maybe punch out a quick article on Westerfield Tucker this afternoon (nothing fancy, but at least C-class in depth). Would you be willing to review a second short article so that maybe we can get a slightly more interesting hook out of this? ~ Pbritti (talk) 13:16, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@LEvalyn: I am going to have to do another couple QPQs, but Karen B. Westerfield Tucker is ready for your review. The alt to reflect this second article is below:
Based on my review, I think this is good to go once the QPQs are complete. I couldn't think of a more interesting hook, so I feel like this one is interesting enough. Please ping me when the QPQs are ready. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 02:24, 3 April 2024 (UTC)