Talk:The Outrageous Okona

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Star Trek Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Ok, so this obviously needs either re-writing or removal. I wish I knew either of those... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.16.135.165 (talk) 18:43, 2005 July 29 (UTC)

Plot size

The plot section for this episode is huge. Wouldn't a summary be more practical than a scene by scene description of every minute detail? The pre-Cyberia23 version is better imo, it's more readable and provides a more concise description of the episode. (PsychoSmith 22:50, 4 February 2007 (UTC))[reply]

OMFG Teri Hatcher was so hot nineteen years ago! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.166.39.127 (talk) 04:05, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hotness or not, not only is the plot synopsis long (however forty-three minutes of show tends to be as is the case for ALL TNG epeisodes. Some of the quotations and facts from the episode are false. It would be easier to leave out the individual conversations and instead supply them with a general statement of the conversations.--74.131.59.151 (talk) 17:57, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Outrageous Okona. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141102142006/http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/3811/star-trek-next-generation-season-2/ to http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/3811/star-trek-next-generation-season-2/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:56, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]