Talk:The Origins of Political Order

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Improvements

An article has to start somewhere. How else can it be improved? DanielDemaret (talk) 11:18, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

Francis Fukuyama was once a favourite of the US right. His new book, however, is a historical survey showing why the anti-state instincts of the Tea Party movement are wrong by Will Hutton in The Guardian 20 May 2011
What makes an ordered, vital society – and does Francis Fukuyama have the answer? by David Runciman in The Guardian 12 May 2011.
A return to the beginning of history recasts the story of modernisation. Frank Furedi is enlightened by Frank Furedi in Times Higher Education 19 May 2011.
Review by Robin Blackburn in The Independent 13 May 2011.
From ‘End of History’ Author, a Look at the Beginning and Middle by Nicholas Wade in New York Times 7 March 2011.
Francis Fukuyama’s Theory of the State by Michael Lind in the New York Times 15 April 2011.
Destination unknown by John Gray in the Literary Review
Review by Martin Hewson in Institute of Historical Research May 2012
Review by Gerard DeGroot in the Washington Post 8 April 2011
How to get to the end of history by Ian Morris in Slate 2 May 2011
The good, the great and the gelded The Economist 31 March 2011
How Much ‘Progress’ Have We Made? by William Pfaff in The New York Review of Books 24 November 2011
Review by Jon Sallet in The Washington Independent Review of Books
Review by Christopher Caldwell in Financial Times on 30 April 2011
Visionary of the Big Picture by Tim Soutphommasane in The Australian 9 July 2011
Review by David Marquand in the New Statesman 9 June 2011
From Dynasty to Democracy - Nations did not find stability, or sustained prosperity, until they became accountable to their citizens by David Gress in the Wall Street Journal 16 April 2011
Review by G. John Ikenberry in Foreign Affairs May/June 2011

--Anthonyhcole (talk) 04:43, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gray's so called review hardly reviews the book at all, it mostly deals with criticism towards his previous book.Star Lord - 星王 (talk) 17:38, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pfaff's and Ikenberry's reviews require a subscription.Star Lord - 星王 (talk) 17:56, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Translucing it here while trying to learn about DYK.

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Star Lord - 星王 (talk) 12:00, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Primary source claims presented as facts

The article includes various statements presented as facts even if they are erroneous, such as: "This is because chimps, the genetic ancestors to humans, engage in kin relations based on cooperation" (Chimpanzee shares a distant common ancestor with humans, homo sapiens does not derive from the Pan genus, although both are Hominidae). The article also relies too much on the primary source (the book), thus the resulting text may also include editor original research when interpreting its claims. —Paleo Neonate – 09:08, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]