Talk:The Ooze (website)

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Websites: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

With a little time, this page will be flooded with legitimate news and media connections to verify what an influential website this is. It might be more appropriate to title it the Ooze (without the .com), however that is already taken by a video game.

Please help create a disambiguation page for "The Ooze" so both the video game and web resource can be listed. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Whitehorse2 (talk • contribs) 20:33, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"With a little time, this page will be flooded with legitimate news and media connections to verify what an influential website this is". Six-and-a-half years later, and we're still waiting. Narky Blert (talk) 21:21, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Inactive?

Seems the site has been discontinued, but please feel free to revert me (ideally with sources) if I made an error changing the article to past tense. GermanJoe (talk) 18:38, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]