Talk:The Only Three Questions That Count

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

This article was nominated for deletion on 24 January 2007. The result of the discussion was Keep.

Should not be deleted

I did not create the page, but I removed the previous delete message because this page appears to meet Wikipedia criteria, particularly since I edited it to be more NPOV. User Plecech has a history of arbitrarily nominating financial pages for deletion. This seems abusive and not in the spirit of Wikipedia.

This page is similar to articles for other books. See The Intelligent Investor andFreakonomics. Netsumdisc 16:20, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This book meets Wikipedia:Notability (books) criteria. I have edited it to address any NPOV concerns. Please see WP:FAITH. Netsumdisc 16:37, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

I've reworked the article a bit, removing some parts which looked a bit too promotional. It's still a bit too much of a marketing piece though. For further improvement, I recommend that the article summarize some of the information from the book's reviews, both good and bad, to show how it was received. --El on ka 23:44, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removing source

Removing one source as unverifiable and some editorializing. Netsumdisc (talk) 01:20, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Source is back. Removing vandalism[1] and spam. Netsumdisc (talk) 02:01, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"3 quesitons that count" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 3 quesitons that count. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Reyk _YO! 21:16, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]