Talk:The Old Man (Seinfeld)

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television: Episode coverage / Seinfeld

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article is supported by the Seinfeld task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Fair use rationale for Image:Sein ep417.jpg

Image:Sein ep417.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:39, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: consensus to move the page, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 04:22, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Old Man → The Old Man (Seinfeld) – plays by Maxim Gorky and Edgar Wallace, songs by Bing Crosby 1954, Colm C.T. Wilkinson 1977, John McDermott (singer), The Fureys 1982, Matt Lucas (singer), and The Old Man (1931 film), based on the Edgar Wallace play of the same name, The Old Man (2012 film). A TV episode title should probably never be sitting on top of other subjects, certainly not for something as generic as "The Old Man". In ictu oculi (talk) 08:11, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support "The Old Man" should be a disambiguation page. the Old Man is a form of address that is frequently used, and usually means father or husband, so these are most likely the primary topics for the term. It is also used to refer to the boss or commanding officer as a derivation of father. -- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 06:49, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Page views show this to be the primary topic. The Seinfeld episode 4,100 views in the 90 days. The 2012 film 1,400 in the same time frame. -- Calidum 16:33, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not surprising at all, but that would be a minor component of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:18, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support: A 4:1 ratio is insufficient to establish a primary topic, and there are other alternative topics as well as that one. —BarrelProof (talk) 00:01, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Normally, that would be sufficient to establish the topic as primary, per "much more likely than any other topic, and more likely than all the other topics combined." Dekimasuよ! 20:17, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The benchmark I was previously given in another discussion (where, I don't remember) was 10:1. That 4:1 ratio also considers only one alternative topic – not "all the other topics combined". —BarrelProof (talk) 21:33, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Except the actual policy (WP:PRIMARYTOPIC) sets no such ratio, be it 2:1, 4:1, or 10:1. And 10:1 is ridiculous. You're welcome to keep your support, but I hope the closing administration dismisses it based on such a ludicrous ratio you expect. -- Calidum 01:27, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I may have miscalculated but in Google Books the ratio of (Maxim Gorky play) + (Edgar Wallace play) + (Bing Crosby song) + (1931 film) to (Seinfeld) appears to be around 18:1 in favour of the other subjects, which makes the above discussion rather moot. Though I agree with BarrelProof and 67.70.35.44. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:23, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Clearly not the first thing you'd think of when you heard the phrase. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:08, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nominator's comments. Definitely not the primary topic in any way. —innotata 00:21, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support. If there is a primary topic then it is not the Seinfeld episode, which satisfies the GNG but barely. Andrewa (talk) 16:48, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.