Talk:The Old Curiosity Shop (1911 film)

The Old Curiosity Shop (1911 film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 14, 2015. (Reviewed version).

Film: Silent / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Silent films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Old Curiosity Shop (1911 film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 22:14, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have this one done tomorrow, and some more over the week JAGUAR 22:14, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Initial comments

"The Old Curiosity Shop by Charles Dickens" - title should be in italics
"that was limited in scope by the single reel format" - what does this mean? Was the film shortened in length due to the reel or is this referring to Dickens' novel?
"The film focuses on the grandfather who gambles into poverty" - would sound clearer as The film focuses on a grandfather who gambles himself into poverty
"The surviving status of this film likely means that an more in-depth" - a
" In 2012, the work was confirmed to be a Thanhouser" - this didn't make sense to me the first time. Should it read In 2012, the work was confirmed to be a Thanhouser production??
"The film is a condensed adaptation of Dicken's work" - Dickens'
"The film was promoted by the Thanhouser as a film" - "the Thanhouser Company"?
"that every Dicken's lover would enjoy" - again Dickens'

On hold

Sorry for the delay in reviewing this. I have a FAC, four GANs and two other reviews to do all at once! I noticed a shortage of references but with all things considered, this should be fine if all of the above are clarified. JAGUAR 21:14, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jaguar: All set. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 15:03, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, this should be good to go now. I have limited internet access at the moment but once it's stable I can begin reviewing more.

JAGUAR 15:57, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]