Talk:The Odd Couple (film)

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force.

Plot

This article is missing a Plot section. You can help. Hoverfish 17:47, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how to edit but there was another Broadway version not listed. https://playbill.com/article/revisit-the-gender-swapped-revival-of-the-odd-couple-starring-rita-moreno-and-sally-struthers 70.188.161.42 (talk) 13:43, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Theoddcouple.jpg

Image:Theoddcouple.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quotations

is`nt it be better to put the quotations in Wikiquote? N.samimi island (talk) 10:06, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There might be if there was a clear way to let readers know that quotes to an article were there. With the tens of thousands of articles on movies, books, people, etc. it seems unlikely that many readers of those articles would even realize that quotes were available somewhere else. I feel the best way would be for some visible tag be placed on an article with a direct link to quotes about that article. Otherwise, out of sight, out of mind, and the quotes won't be looked at, IMO.Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 17:19, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Odd Couple (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:31, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MPAA rating? (G/M/R/X)

I realize that whereas this film came out in May 1968, while the MPAA rating system (originally rating films G, M, R or X) did not take effect till November of that year, I should well imagine this film was given an appraisal in accordance with that system when the time came (Psycho from 1960 was famously given a "rating" well "after the fact"), and it would be good for the article to state what rating it eventually received, with a notation of when it was so designated, and, if it was "M", what that would be called today ("PG"), or if the appraisal was later changed, say, to just "G". 2601:541:880:38C0:A4ED:72B2:3763:9876 (talk) 09:42, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]