Talk:The Now Now/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lazz R (talk · contribs) 12:06, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

The vast majority of the article meets the good article criteria.

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
The article is written in good English and the subjects involved are well introduced to the reader. Apart from 2-D at the end of the lead: whilst his article is linked, who he is isn't explained. British English must also be used in this article, yet the standard (normalised) score is refered to as normalized (American English).
Since fixed Lazz _R 11:58, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
Very well referenced reliable sources, no original research, copyvio or plagiarism. ~~However, the "release formats" section is completely unreferenced, and may be unnecessary to include.~~
Since fixed Lazz _R 11:58, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
The article addresses all of the main aspects of the subject and consistently stays on topic, with no tangents unrelated to the album.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
The article is written with a neutral point of view with no bias, even in its critical reception section.
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
Article is stable with no edit wars.
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Whilst the article has a small amount of images, the album cover and promotional logo are sufficient for illustrating the article subject. The images are appropriately used and have suitable captions where they are needed.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
~~The article vastly passes the good article criteria, however the minor problems must be fixed for it to become a listed as a good article.~~
Following the nominator's changes, the article passes the good article criteria. Lazz _R 11:58, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Lazz R: All problems have been fixed. Phil roc (c) 18:54, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, @Philroc: The Now Now will now be listed as a good article! Lazz _R 12:03, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]