Talk:The North Remembers/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sagecandor (talk · contribs) 19:39, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I read through this article a while back when it was sitting up here for so long. I'll grab it now to write up a review. Sagecandor (talk) 19:39, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Successful good article nomination

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of June 12, 2017, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Okay this one is excellent. Well written intro section. Great structure. Loving the style layout of the plot section. Good "clear and concise" wording per WP:WIAGA.

2. Verifiable?: Article cites all facts asserted, sometimes at ends of sections instead of ends of paragraphs or sentences. I guess that is okay. But for the future I'd suggest adding dups to ends of all paragraphs.

3. Broad in coverage?: Very thorough. Covering topics including: Plot, At Dragonstone, In the Riverlands, At Winterfell, Beyond the Wall, In the Red Waste, In King's Landing, Production, Writing, Casting, Filming locations, Reception, Ratings, Critical reception, Accolades.

4. Neutral point of view?: Yes, article is indeed praiseworthy of its subject. But it is backed up with plenty of reliable sources.

5. Stable? Stable going back several months.

6. Images?: One fair use image File:Game-of-thrones-s02-e01-red waste.jpg. Good fair use rationale. 4 free use images. All licenses are good.

If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it Good article reassessed. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Sagecandor (talk) 23:44, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]