Talk:The Next 365 Days

Histmerge

Hello @Edriiic:: I was wondering why you created a article for the The Next 365 Days when I created a draft months ago at Draft:The Next 365 Days. Could we potentially merged the editing histories of my draft, so that its history isn't tossed aside or thrown away? Cardei012597 (talk) 00:26, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Collaborative Project or Nah?

Dear @User:Cardei012597, I’ve been following this page for a while and I’ve been seeing your complaints as regards for creation of this article, I want to remind you that Wikipedia is a collaborative project and as thus, you don’t claim any right to any article whatsoever; someone might have probably created an article (which you have also created a draft), the only solution is to merge it, by including information that might be in one and isn’t in another, that’s just it, no one should claim an article, if the article was posted, another person woulda not been able to create it.

I also saw you saying you wanna leave Wikipedia cause of that, NAAAAH! that’s not needed, the earlier you see Wikipedia as a collaborative project, the better, and please keep editing Wikipedia, love your work.

Kind regards B.Korlah (talk) 15:33, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I find this solution very fair to everyone. I hope other editors who work on drafts for months get to find out that their work was pointless and redirected due to one other editor who made a quickly written page on the same subject. I hope this experience is given to all so we can all learn this vital lesson on the (lack of) importance of our work on this site. I am done. I know that none of my work is valued in anyway shape or form. Happy editing and good bye. Cardei012597 (talk) 18:29, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]