Talk:The Naturalist on the River Amazons

The Naturalist on the River Amazons has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 15, 2013. (Reviewed version).

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

A fact from The Naturalist on the River Amazons appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 December 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Charles Darwin called The Naturalist on the River Amazons "the best book of Natural History Travels ever published in England"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2012/December. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Naturalist on the River Amazons.

Wikipedia

History of Science Mid‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Brazil Mid‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Naturalist on the River Amazons/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs) 08:59, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will take on this review and will examine the article in detail shortly. On first inspection it looks well-written and comprehensive. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:59, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for taking this on. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:39, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

First reading

" He constantly relates the wildlife to the people, explaining how they hunt, what they eat and what they use as medicines." - This is somewhat ambiguous, are you talking about the wildlife or the people in the second half of the sentence?

added 'the people'

In the "Major versions" section, one bracketed comment is in italics and another is not. Why is this?

syntax error fixed

"He describes how one went upriver before the steamboats arrived" - I don't think the use of the word "one" is very suitable in this sentence.

said 'travellers'

"He gets a musical cricket, Chlorocoelus tanana." - Maybe obtains, is given, purchases or whatever best describes the event.

done

"Bates hires a boat made of stonewood for a three month trip up the Tapajos river, salting meat and grinding coffee, ..." - I had to read this sentence twice before I understood it. It would be better rephrased.

reworded, split

"They regularly eat turtles." - Is this referring to the local inhabitants or to Bates' party?

added 'the people'

" the Bouto or river dolphin used to take "the shape of a beautiful woman, with hair hanging loose to her heels, and walking ashore at night in the streets of Ega, to entice the young men down to the water" where would grab them and "plunge beneath the waves with a triumphant cry"" - The last part of this sentence is missing a subject.

added 'the Bouto'

In some places, vernucular names have capital letters and in others they do not. "hyacinthine macaw" "Giant Anteater" "howler monkey" "Crested Oropendola" etc. I would be inclined to disregard the practice of Wikipedia bird articles to use capital letters and use lower case throughout.

ok, let's do that, please fix any I missed!

I'll move on to the Reception section later. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:00, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Will be away from desk till 12 June. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:23, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Darwin was happy to have the Naturalist on his side, and to use the book, in particular Bates's robust evidence of mimicry in "the Butterflies of the genus Heliconius", in the Origin of Species debate which was still heated in 1863." - This sentence is a bit convoluted and could be split in two.

done

"The reviewer finds Bates among the most readable, and free of the usual "personal twaddle" of travel and adventure books, ..." - Ditto.

done

"I should like, from the Everyman Library Bates' – Naturalist on the Amazon... The first I want because I intend some day to go to South America – to Peru or Ecuador, not the Amazon. But I know Bates is good."" - This quotation mentions "The first" but I'm unclear to what that refers.

removed (it referred to another book)

Which brings me to the end, and wanting to read the book! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:32, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Super, hope it has the same effect on other readers! Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:21, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The captions to the images are a bit inconsistent!
The first image mentions "However Bates was not carrying a gun at that moment.", which needs some explanation if used at all.

added 'as shown' - Jim Mallet comments in the ref in the caption that the artist had added a gun contrary to the account in the book.

Some mention "Figure 38" or similar, others do not.

removed

One mentions the title of the book and gets it wrong!

removed

Some mention the illustrator and others do not.

It's only possible when the illustrator is identifiable; many images are unsigned.

Otherwise, looking good. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:05, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA Criteria

1a The article is well written. Certain alterations to the prose have bee made as suggested above.
1b The article conforms with the MOS guidelines.
2a&b The article is well referenced, includes many block quotes and has inline citations for all contentious statements.
2c There is no original research as far as I can see.
3a&b The coverage is broad enough and the article does not include irrelevant material.
4 The article is neutral.
5 The article was a stub before being expanded by the nominator in December 2012 and has hardly been edited by anybody else since then.
6 The images are mostly in the public domain having been created over one hundred years ago. Others are appropriately licensed.
7 The images are relevant to the topic and have suitable captions.
Overall assessment - Pass. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 04:57, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Naturalist on the River Amazons. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:32, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]