Talk:The National (Scotland)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 08:29, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
Comments
- It appears to be just Sunday Herald rather than The Sunday Herald. Same for Evening Times and Financial Times.
- Done.
- The infobox has "Pro-independence" which simply links to Scottish independence, is there a more refined link available?
- It seems to be a case of all roads leading to Rome. Pro Scottish independence and Scottish Independence Movement both link back to the Scottish independence article, but I'll keep looking.
- I'd be ok with a link to a specific section of the same article if that's possible? The Rambling Man (talk) 16:40, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
- It seems to be a case of all roads leading to Rome. Pro Scottish independence and Scottish Independence Movement both link back to the Scottish independence article, but I'll keep looking.
- Picky, but should McPravda really be McPravda?
- Done.
- Can you contextualise Lesley Riddoch, why her opinion is worthy of inclusion in the lead...
- Done.
- Not keen on single-sentence paragraphs, any option for merging those two which finish the Background and Reception sections?
- Done.
- "first appeared " why not "was first published"?
- Done.
- No need to relink The Guardian in the Launch section, you already linked it in the lead and the Background section. The Spectator is also linked in three consecutive sections.
- Done.
- Sunday Herald is linked in the main article so no need for it to be in the See also section.
- Done.
- Just a thought, worth adding a note in the infobox as to when the very precise circulation statistic was valid.
- Done.
Nice, neat article. Placing on hold for a week. The Rambling Man (talk) 12:53, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
Although I didn't nominate this one, as I pretty much wrote it from scratch I'm happy to do what I can to get it promoted. This is Paul (talk) 16:12, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
- Think I've done everything now, but let me know if there are any more issues and I'll take another look. Thanks for the review. Cheers, This is Paul (talk) 17:03, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
- It looks fine to me, so I'll pass to GA status, thanks for your timely and collaborative responses! The Rambling Man (talk) 18:12, 4 July 2015 (UTC)