Talk:The Myth of the Eastern Front/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Buidhe (talk · contribs) 12:41, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Some issues that I noticed:
- The lead mentions "tendency to whitewash Red Army crimes." This seems undue since as far as I can tell only one review mentions this.
- In the "Themes" section, the bullet points should be integrated into prose.
- ENGVAR: mixes -ized and -ised spelling. Should consistently use United States spelling.
- "opening of the Russian archives" Is it really Russian archives that are meant, or Soviet/Eastern Bloc archives—including Ukraine, Poland, etc.? buidhe 22:51, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for pointing these out; I've addressed them as follows:
- Revised.
- Converted to prose.
- Standardised to American English.
- Removed "Russian" as unneeded per the rest of the sentence.
--K.e.coffman (talk) 00:48, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Passing: This article meets standards on prose, coverage, focus, copyvio, original research, image relevance, and neutral point of view. Good work! buidhe 01:13, 23 January 2020 (UTC)